The election is coming.. the election is coming!!!
Is anyone else nervous/anxious/excited to see what happens like I am? Ok, I'm sure you're tired of hearing about it and kind of disgusted with the candidates.
I have an article about that... it will be published Monday.
But meanwhile...
Are you confused about all of this pro-life talk? Is it wrong/ignorant to be a "one-issue voter" and just vote according to a candidate's stance on abortion/euthanasia/etc? You should read Evangelium Vitae, if you haven't. It's very clear on those issues (as is every other Church document/statement on those issues... but whatever, people believe what they want to believe). I posted my favorite quotes from EV here.
I recently read a quote from Fr. Frank Pavone, director of Priests for Life, in which he says a government that authorizes the killing of babies and old people has become a "tyrant state" and moral corruption has been institutionalized in policy. It's not about one issue or another then, the very nature of the state is wrong. He takes this expression from Evangelium Vitae n. 20. I had already read this encyclical but I went back and read n. 20. It's worth a rereading so I'll post it here:
This view of freedom leads to a serious distortion of life in society. If the promotion of the self is understood in terms of absolute autonomy, people inevitably reach the point of rejecting one another. Everyone else is considered an enemy from whom one has to defend oneself. Thus soci- ety becomes a mass of individuals placed side by side, but without any mutual bonds. Each one wishes to assert himself independently of the other and in fact intends to make his own interests prevail. Still, in the face of other people's analogous interests, some kind of compromise must be found, if one wants a society in which the maximum possible freedom is guaranteed to each individual. In this way, any reference to common values and to a truth absolutely binding on everyone is lost, and social life ventures on to the shifting sands of complete relativism. At that point, everything is negotiable, everything is open to bargaining: even the first of the fundamental rights, the right to life.
This is what is happening also at the level of politics and government: the original and inalienable right to life is questioned or denied on the basis of a parliamentary vote or the will of one part of the people-even if it is the majority. This is the sinister result of a relativism which reigns unopposed: the "right" ceases to be such, because it is no longer firmly founded on the inviolable dignity of the person, but is made subject to the will of the stronger part. In this way democracy, contradicting its own principles, effectively moves towards a form of totalitarianism. The State is no longer the "common home" where all can live together on the basis of principles of fundamental equality, but is transformed into a tyrant State, which arrogates to itself the right to dispose of the life of the weakest and most defenceless members, from the unborn child to the elderly, in the name of a public interest which is really nothing but the interest of one part. The appearance of the strictest respect for legality is maintained, at least when the laws permitting abortion and euthanasia are the result of a ballot in accordance with what are generally seen as the rules of democracy. Really, what we have here is only the tragic caricature of legality; the democratic ideal, which is only truly such when it acknowledges and safeguards the dignity of every human person, is betrayed in its very foundations: "How is it still possible to speak of the dignity of every human person when the killing of the weakest and most innocent is permitted? In the name of what justice is the most unjust of discriminations practised: some individuals are held to be deserving of defence and others are denied that dignity?" When this happens, the process leading to the breakdown of a genuinely human co-existence and the disintegration of the State itself has already begun.
To claim the right to abortion, infanticide and euthanasia, and to recognize that right in law, means to attribute to human freedom a perverse and evil significance: that of an absolute power over others and against others. This is the death of true freedom:
"Truly, truly, I say to you, every one who commits sin is a slave to sin" (Jn 8:34).
No comments:
Post a Comment